team-member

Troy Hough

Fairview Park, OH

Licensed for 16 years

Law Degree

Awards

Primary Practice Area

Child custody

Language

English

About

Practices Areas

Child custody

Language

English

Contact

Hough Legal Offices21887 Lorain Rd # 306Fairview Park, OH, 44126-333021887 Lorain Rd # 306Fairview Park, OH, 44126-3330

Office: N/A

Website: N/A

Reviews

anonymous
October 4, 2012

Mr. Hough served as GAL in a recent custody case. He was appointed by the court to act in the best interest of the child involved. He did not understand the specifics of the case (initial determination vs modification due to abuse/neglect). He refused on several occasions to share information with the plaintiff and respond to plaintiff's counsel. His own records indicate a very clear bias toward one parent - minutes of communication were documented relative to the plaintiff, while hours and hours of communication were documented relative to the defendent in the case. He even went so far as to provide false testimony while under oath. This individual is truly not competent to serve in this capacity.

anonymous
October 4, 2012

Mr. Hough served as GAL in a recent custody case. He was appointed by the court to act in the best interest of the child involved. He did not understand the specifics of the case (initial determination vs modification due to abuse/neglect). He refused on several occasions to share information with the plaintiff and respond to plaintiff's counsel. His own records indicate a very clear bias toward one parent - minutes of communication were documented relative to the plaintiff, while hours and hours of communication were documented relative to the defendent in the case. He even went so far as to provide false testimony while under oath. This individual is truly not competent to serve in this capacity.

anonymous
October 4, 2012

Mr. Hough served as GAL in a recent custody case. He was appointed by the court to act in the best interest of the child involved. He did not understand the specifics of the case (initial determination vs modification due to abuse/neglect). He refused on several occasions to share information with the plaintiff and respond to plaintiff's counsel. His own records indicate a very clear bias toward one parent - minutes of communication were documented relative to the plaintiff, while hours and hours of communication were documented relative to the defendent in the case. He even went so far as to provide false testimony while under oath. This individual is truly not competent to serve in this capacity.