Thomas H Fain
Seattle, WA
Licensed for 45 years
Law Degree
Awards
Primary Practice Area
Litigation
Language
English
About
Language
English
Contact
701 5th Ave Ste 4750Seattle, WA, 98104-7030701 5th Ave Ste 4750Seattle, WA, 98104-7030
Office: N/A
Website: N/AReviews
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.
Treated me discourteously from our first meeting. Was unavailable, unwilling to consider suggestions, and so preoccupied with chatting up his old-boys-club colleagues that he forgot about me and the clerk had to come out into the hall to locate me for my hearing. He did not once speak on my behalf. Vastly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and his attitude was reflected in my outcome.
Very poor service. He has poor communication and did not advocate on my behalf. I sense he was very judgmental, and this affected his representation (non-existent) of me. No matter the offense, the lawyer should always advocate on behalf of the client.