he was great lawyer and honestly very helpful i appreciate with his job.

Attorney Davis took my case after I was dissatisfied with a previous lawyer. It would have been in my best interest to have hired him first. He is experienced in tenet and landlord law. I was pleased with the outcome of my case. Also his personal interaction was creditable.

Mr. Davis does alot Landlord tenant and real estate work. My experience with him has been good, he answers call and I have his cell phone number which allows me to contact him whenever I need a question answered. The one thing I like about him is he is down to earth and keeps me informed. He also knows what hes doing in court.

Tarik is understanding compassionate, and sincere. If these are qualitiies you require in a lawyer, then in my experience I've found him to posses them. However Tarik is not a divorce attorney; what I mean by that is that he doesn't even have basic know-how/skills necessary to navigate a moderate to complex contested divorce. If your divorce involves marital property, disparity of income, enhanced earnings, custody modificatiion, visitation issues, abuse, domestic violence, etc (any complicating factor) then you need a specialist, a divorce lawyer who practices Family law primarily and has a sub-specialty in the particular area of family law that you foresee complexity in. Furthermore if your matrimonial case is going to trial do not expect Tarik to make a grand showing on your behalf, you might have to do a lot of the talking yourself if you want anything to get done. Going through a contested divorce without a good lawyer on your side is dangerous. If you can afford Tarik, then you can also afford a lawyer that practices Family law primarily, and then you have no excuse to hire him instead. Please keep in mind that my review is based on his performance in a divorce case, and because I haven't used his services in any other type of case I cannot offer a valid opinion as regards his expertise/performance in other areas of the law, except as indicated above.

he was great lawyer and honestly very helpful i appreciate with his job.

Attorney Davis took my case after I was dissatisfied with a previous lawyer. It would have been in my best interest to have hired him first. He is experienced in tenet and landlord law. I was pleased with the outcome of my case. Also his personal interaction was creditable.

Mr. Davis does alot Landlord tenant and real estate work. My experience with him has been good, he answers call and I have his cell phone number which allows me to contact him whenever I need a question answered. The one thing I like about him is he is down to earth and keeps me informed. He also knows what hes doing in court.

Tarik is understanding compassionate, and sincere. If these are qualitiies you require in a lawyer, then in my experience I've found him to posses them. However Tarik is not a divorce attorney; what I mean by that is that he doesn't even have basic know-how/skills necessary to navigate a moderate to complex contested divorce. If your divorce involves marital property, disparity of income, enhanced earnings, custody modificatiion, visitation issues, abuse, domestic violence, etc (any complicating factor) then you need a specialist, a divorce lawyer who practices Family law primarily and has a sub-specialty in the particular area of family law that you foresee complexity in. Furthermore if your matrimonial case is going to trial do not expect Tarik to make a grand showing on your behalf, you might have to do a lot of the talking yourself if you want anything to get done. Going through a contested divorce without a good lawyer on your side is dangerous. If you can afford Tarik, then you can also afford a lawyer that practices Family law primarily, and then you have no excuse to hire him instead. Please keep in mind that my review is based on his performance in a divorce case, and because I haven't used his services in any other type of case I cannot offer a valid opinion as regards his expertise/performance in other areas of the law, except as indicated above.

he was great lawyer and honestly very helpful i appreciate with his job.

Attorney Davis took my case after I was dissatisfied with a previous lawyer. It would have been in my best interest to have hired him first. He is experienced in tenet and landlord law. I was pleased with the outcome of my case. Also his personal interaction was creditable.

Mr. Davis does alot Landlord tenant and real estate work. My experience with him has been good, he answers call and I have his cell phone number which allows me to contact him whenever I need a question answered. The one thing I like about him is he is down to earth and keeps me informed. He also knows what hes doing in court.

Tarik is understanding compassionate, and sincere. If these are qualitiies you require in a lawyer, then in my experience I've found him to posses them. However Tarik is not a divorce attorney; what I mean by that is that he doesn't even have basic know-how/skills necessary to navigate a moderate to complex contested divorce. If your divorce involves marital property, disparity of income, enhanced earnings, custody modificatiion, visitation issues, abuse, domestic violence, etc (any complicating factor) then you need a specialist, a divorce lawyer who practices Family law primarily and has a sub-specialty in the particular area of family law that you foresee complexity in. Furthermore if your matrimonial case is going to trial do not expect Tarik to make a grand showing on your behalf, you might have to do a lot of the talking yourself if you want anything to get done. Going through a contested divorce without a good lawyer on your side is dangerous. If you can afford Tarik, then you can also afford a lawyer that practices Family law primarily, and then you have no excuse to hire him instead. Please keep in mind that my review is based on his performance in a divorce case, and because I haven't used his services in any other type of case I cannot offer a valid opinion as regards his expertise/performance in other areas of the law, except as indicated above.