Susan performed a fair and detailed investigation, and stayed completely neutral in all of her interactions with both parties. She was only focused on the truth, and what is best for the child in our situation. I suspect that the negative reviews came from parents who were not able to persuade Susan away from the truth, and thus did not fare well in her investigation. If you are interested in the truth being reported, and the best interest of your child, Susan is the CFI for you.

Really pays attention to detail. Gives fair and detailed report to both parties.

Susan failed to execute any kind of thorough investigation. She not only failed to do her job but made it blatantly obvious that she is biased toward one party. The report she provided was filled with false information with zero substantiated evidence of claims being made. The report also contained MULTIPLE typos and even had the wrong names of people interviewed, along with timelines that were completely inconsistent. The effort and report provided is something that might be expected of a year one undergrad student. Don’t waste your time with Susan…

When she performed the CFI, she did not want to hear the facts. She cut me off when anything negative was discussed about one of the parties. She is very one sided in her reviews and does not remain unbiased. The children are not her concern. Only the money is.

Susan was hired as a CFI, she failed to address the issues that were a big driving factor in the case. She favored one party, it seems she had her mind made up and did not put the children's best interest in front of the findings.

Susan performed a fair and detailed investigation, and stayed completely neutral in all of her interactions with both parties. She was only focused on the truth, and what is best for the child in our situation. I suspect that the negative reviews came from parents who were not able to persuade Susan away from the truth, and thus did not fare well in her investigation. If you are interested in the truth being reported, and the best interest of your child, Susan is the CFI for you.

Really pays attention to detail. Gives fair and detailed report to both parties.

Susan failed to execute any kind of thorough investigation. She not only failed to do her job but made it blatantly obvious that she is biased toward one party. The report she provided was filled with false information with zero substantiated evidence of claims being made. The report also contained MULTIPLE typos and even had the wrong names of people interviewed, along with timelines that were completely inconsistent. The effort and report provided is something that might be expected of a year one undergrad student. Don’t waste your time with Susan…

When she performed the CFI, she did not want to hear the facts. She cut me off when anything negative was discussed about one of the parties. She is very one sided in her reviews and does not remain unbiased. The children are not her concern. Only the money is.

Susan was hired as a CFI, she failed to address the issues that were a big driving factor in the case. She favored one party, it seems she had her mind made up and did not put the children's best interest in front of the findings.

Susan performed a fair and detailed investigation, and stayed completely neutral in all of her interactions with both parties. She was only focused on the truth, and what is best for the child in our situation. I suspect that the negative reviews came from parents who were not able to persuade Susan away from the truth, and thus did not fare well in her investigation. If you are interested in the truth being reported, and the best interest of your child, Susan is the CFI for you.

Really pays attention to detail. Gives fair and detailed report to both parties.

Susan failed to execute any kind of thorough investigation. She not only failed to do her job but made it blatantly obvious that she is biased toward one party. The report she provided was filled with false information with zero substantiated evidence of claims being made. The report also contained MULTIPLE typos and even had the wrong names of people interviewed, along with timelines that were completely inconsistent. The effort and report provided is something that might be expected of a year one undergrad student. Don’t waste your time with Susan…

When she performed the CFI, she did not want to hear the facts. She cut me off when anything negative was discussed about one of the parties. She is very one sided in her reviews and does not remain unbiased. The children are not her concern. Only the money is.

Susan was hired as a CFI, she failed to address the issues that were a big driving factor in the case. She favored one party, it seems she had her mind made up and did not put the children's best interest in front of the findings.

Susan performed a fair and detailed investigation, and stayed completely neutral in all of her interactions with both parties. She was only focused on the truth, and what is best for the child in our situation. I suspect that the negative reviews came from parents who were not able to persuade Susan away from the truth, and thus did not fare well in her investigation. If you are interested in the truth being reported, and the best interest of your child, Susan is the CFI for you.

Really pays attention to detail. Gives fair and detailed report to both parties.

Susan failed to execute any kind of thorough investigation. She not only failed to do her job but made it blatantly obvious that she is biased toward one party. The report she provided was filled with false information with zero substantiated evidence of claims being made. The report also contained MULTIPLE typos and even had the wrong names of people interviewed, along with timelines that were completely inconsistent. The effort and report provided is something that might be expected of a year one undergrad student. Don’t waste your time with Susan…

When she performed the CFI, she did not want to hear the facts. She cut me off when anything negative was discussed about one of the parties. She is very one sided in her reviews and does not remain unbiased. The children are not her concern. Only the money is.

Susan was hired as a CFI, she failed to address the issues that were a big driving factor in the case. She favored one party, it seems she had her mind made up and did not put the children's best interest in front of the findings.