Steven Spencer
Beverly Hills, CA
Licensed for 36 years
Law Degree
Awards
Primary Practice Area
Motorcycle accident
Language
English
About
I am a 25+ year litigator,and a longtime member of ABOTA.My specialty is premises cases,including construction accident,slip and fall and fight cases.I have also tried a number of auto and products cases.At this point I have tried over 70 cases to verdict.
Practices Areas
Car Accident
Motorcycle accident
Language
English
Contact
Carpenter,Zuckerman and Rowley8827 W Olympic BlvdBeverly Hills, CA, 90211-3613
Office: N/A
Website: N/AReviews
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.
Steve was very insightful and pointed in hos analysis of my case. He is very experienced, having tried multiple cases and explained what evidence would be admitted and excluded.