Stanley Ray Hartford
Los Alamitos, CA
Licensed for 47 years
Law Degree
Awards
Primary Practice Area
Estate Planning
Language
English
About
Practices Areas
Estate Planning
Business
Probate
Language
English
Contact
Reviews
Stan did a great job for me mediating a very involved situation that could have ended up in trial which would have been very costly to me. He is a great mediating attorney and very positive, and trustworthy.
He is not qualified or up to date on current laws and new regulations. He does not return phone calls or emails in a timely manner. He has to be told he is missing important documents. He is sloppy. Because of his incompetence, we had fines and fees. He should be disbarred. He causes conflict within families. I could see through him and would never have hired him. I had no say in the matter.
stanley hartford did not do what was in trust and wii. Was not available most of time. also,sloppy paper work, many complications. finally, once loved one was deseased, hartford had an attitude of she is not here so it really did not matter.In judges chamber went against his own paid client with his personal view to judge. Also in depositon declared he did not like child mother wanted.he liked other child.
Stan did a great job for me mediating a very involved situation that could have ended up in trial which would have been very costly to me. He is a great mediating attorney and very positive, and trustworthy.
He is not qualified or up to date on current laws and new regulations. He does not return phone calls or emails in a timely manner. He has to be told he is missing important documents. He is sloppy. Because of his incompetence, we had fines and fees. He should be disbarred. He causes conflict within families. I could see through him and would never have hired him. I had no say in the matter.
stanley hartford did not do what was in trust and wii. Was not available most of time. also,sloppy paper work, many complications. finally, once loved one was deseased, hartford had an attitude of she is not here so it really did not matter.In judges chamber went against his own paid client with his personal view to judge. Also in depositon declared he did not like child mother wanted.he liked other child.