team-member

R H R Alf

Green Bay, WI

N/A

Law Degree

Awards

Primary Practice Area

Criminal Defense

Language

English

About

I've been married to the same woman since 1981.  We have three kids, a daughter adn two boys.In my spare time, I like to read, write essays and fictional stories, ride my bike, work out, watch movies, and hang out with my family and friends.  I believe in striking a balance between my personal and professional life: if I don't, then I'm not good in either area.

Practices Areas

Criminal Defense

Estate Planning

Divorce and separation

Family

Language

English

Contact

2300 Riverside DrGreen Bay, WI, 54301-1900

Office: N/A

Website: N/A

Reviews

Edmund
November 6, 2020

i hired Alf for assistance in my divorce and custody/placement battle. while the cost was high, you cant put a price on 50/50 custody and placement of children. especially as a father. he negotiated a fair property and debt split, helped me bring up and end shady behavior by my ex, and was, and still is, very understanding with payments. especially with the current covid crisis.

Beth Perry-Wattleworth
January 23, 2018

I felt I had been unfairly blocked from receiving unemployment. While it was declined on appeal, it might have been the facts in the case. The job was a terrible fit for me anyway. Plus during the appeal, Mr Langan dressed down the HR manager and my former (incompetent) boss, that it was worth it just to see them get verbally spanked in front of me. Just satisfying. Mr Langan also led us through creating our wills. He was again empathetic and realistic about what what the protection of a will can do and what it can’t. You can plan and plan, but everyone has to be realistic that no one can foresee every single eventuality. He has tiered will plans that clients based on how much you want his office to do. Are you busy and have lots of assets? Pay more to have his office file papers. Pay less if you can spend your own time filing papers with your financial institutions. Be aware that Mr Langan is one person in private practice with one paralegal. When an attorney is within a firm, there are partners that can assist when individuals have personal and family events, like any of us do. On the flip side of this arrangement, you get an experienced professional that takes the time to get to know you, your case and what’s important to you. Nothing in law moves as fast as it does on courtroom drama TV shows. You may want your legal business wrapped up quickly and behind you, but that’s not reality. Courts don’t work that way, government clerk offices don’t work that way. There’s no special secret to jumping to the head of the line. I highly recommend Mr Langan, a long standing member of the community, who sees each person as the individual they are without judgement.

anonymous
August 26, 2015

Mr. Langan is an honest, ethical attorney and truly listens to the needs of his clients. He is very willing to present different options and fully discuss the possible outcomes. His advice and legal work have been invaluable to me. His staff is very responsive, organized, and available. I would highly recommend Attorney Langan!

Amy
March 28, 2018

I hired Alf Langan for a family court case back in 2012. I wrote an honest poor review of my experience. Now he's disputing my review as if he never represented me. Here is my honest review below, as the original was removed due to his dishonest dispute. If you have this many Poor reviews and have also been disciplined as a lawyer, maybe you should take a look at your performance rather than get honest review removed. I hired this attorney for a very simple family court matter. I made a huge mistake. He does not respond very well to emails, if at all. He sent about 10 emails about a certain topic for NO reason as they were not getting us anywhere. Then I am charged for them. He charged me for part of my initial conversation with him, never telling me this until I see the bill. I waited 2 weeks for a call back and made 3 calls total before getting one back. He sent me a time sensitive email and implied that I needed to answer him and he would pass the answer to the parties involved and then he never did tell them. I left him a voicemail the same day regarding difficulties with the party because of his inaction and requested a call back asap because of this and it is now 2 full business days later and still no word. Today I hired a new attorney who has a much better rating than this man. In my opinion, do NOT waste your money. I have gone through almost $1,500 and all he did was go to one court date and send countless useless emails. Then I had to call him to let him know that these emails were useless and he wasn't listening to me. Although he seems like a nice man, as an attorney; get someone else.

Kevin oliver
August 26, 2016

Very very unprofessional.He has a great paralegal daniel.But he just want money a more money and cant tell u whats going on with ur case.received and email from his paralegal the the DA was dropping the owi charge,get to court ask mr langan and he knows nothing,how are u going to represent me and you not communicating with ur paralegal.PLEASE DO NOT WASTE MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joan
August 14, 2015

Very disappointed with this attorney whose handling of our case caused us a tremendous amount of grief and anxiety. As a recent graduate of law school, I was looking forward to working with him and learning from him but this attorney demonstrated how clients should never be treated. After our initial two meetings and he had been paid, Attorney Langan did not initiate any contact with us whatsoever other than to send additional billings and forward docket filings; filings that we had already obtained ourselves. Our case in the Tax Court had been ongoing for sixteen months by the time Langan was hired and entered an appearance in our case. I sent him copies of the paperwork pertinent to the case, including the results of our discovery requests via USPS Certified Mail. He did not acknowledge that he even received them. Not once did he ask us questions about the facts of the case or what had taken place to date. Consequently, he made a number of errors in the facts he presented to the Court in his pleadings. He appeared for us at the Calendar Call in Tax Court and refused to provide us with a copy of the transcript of the hearing saying even though it existed in the docket, “I don’t know why you would want a copy, I already told you about the hearing.” The judge ordered him to file a brief in the case. What he filed was in the form of a motion and didn’t contain any of the necessary elements of a brief. We sent him an e-mail asking why it wasn’t submitted in the proper form. Langan’s response was: “Do you really want me to answer this, or did you just need to rant. I know you graduated from law school, but you are NOT a lawyer.” He also filed a Motion to Supplement the Record; a motion that was stricken from the record in the case. When we asked him for a clarification concerning the judge’s order, his response was, “If I understand this correctly, the Court rules that since you did not sign the Motion to Supplement the Record that it denied the Motion. We can re-submit the Motion if you wish, I would simply add a signature line for you and Gary, then scan in the signed document and re-file it.” I have no idea why he would say this since he obviously is the attorney representing us and we would not be required to sign his motions in order to have them filed. This same motion indicated that an exhibit was attached, but he failed to attach it. This exhibit consisted of a Forensic Document Examiner’s Report that we had paid $1,500.00 for. Also, Langan had signed an agreement promising to pay the examiner for any additional costs out of the funds in our client escrow account. When Langan received additional billings from the examiner, he would forward them onto us expecting us to pay them even though the invoices were made out to him and he was responsible for their payment. After reviewing our case, Langan told us that we had been treated “egregiously” by the settlement officer in the Collection Due Process Hearing. However, in the Reply Brief that he submitted to the Court, he made an unwarranted derogatory comment about our conduct when dealing with the IRS settlement officer. When we asked him what he was referring to, he actually denied making the statement, even though it clearly appears on Page 7 of the brief. His exact words written in an e-mail to us were: “I did not label you as belligerent; in fact, that word does not appear in my Brief.” Finally, we asked him to withdraw from the case and he agreed. However, the Court denied his motion because it was not done in the proper form and did not comply with Tax Court Rule 24(c).We provided him with a copy of a proper withdrawal motion and it was granted by the Court. We did not feel Attorney Langan demonstrated a high level of skill or professionalism; nor did he exemplify the legal profession’s ideals of honest and ethical dealings in order to protect our legitimate interests in our case.

anonymous
November 5, 2012

I hired this attorney for a very simple family court matter. I made a huge mistake. He does not respond very well to emails, if at all. He sent about 10 emails about a certain topic for NO reason as they were not getting us anywhere. Then I am charged for them. He charged me for part of my initial conversation with him, never telling me this until I see the bill. I waited 2 weeks for a call back and made 3 calls total before getting one back. He sent me a time sensitive email and implied that I needed to answer him and he would pass the answer to the parties involved and then he never did tell them. I left him a voicemail the same day regarding difficulties with the party because of his inaction and requested a call back asap because of this and it is now 2 full business days later and still no word. Today I hired a new attorney who has a much better rating than this man. In my opinion, do NOT waste your money. I have gone through almost $1,500 and all he did was go to one court date and send countless useless emails. Then I had to call him to let him know that these emails were useless and he wasn't listening to me. Although he seems like a nice man, as an attorney; get someone else.

Edmund
November 6, 2020

i hired Alf for assistance in my divorce and custody/placement battle. while the cost was high, you cant put a price on 50/50 custody and placement of children. especially as a father. he negotiated a fair property and debt split, helped me bring up and end shady behavior by my ex, and was, and still is, very understanding with payments. especially with the current covid crisis.

Beth Perry-Wattleworth
January 23, 2018

I felt I had been unfairly blocked from receiving unemployment. While it was declined on appeal, it might have been the facts in the case. The job was a terrible fit for me anyway. Plus during the appeal, Mr Langan dressed down the HR manager and my former (incompetent) boss, that it was worth it just to see them get verbally spanked in front of me. Just satisfying. Mr Langan also led us through creating our wills. He was again empathetic and realistic about what what the protection of a will can do and what it can’t. You can plan and plan, but everyone has to be realistic that no one can foresee every single eventuality. He has tiered will plans that clients based on how much you want his office to do. Are you busy and have lots of assets? Pay more to have his office file papers. Pay less if you can spend your own time filing papers with your financial institutions. Be aware that Mr Langan is one person in private practice with one paralegal. When an attorney is within a firm, there are partners that can assist when individuals have personal and family events, like any of us do. On the flip side of this arrangement, you get an experienced professional that takes the time to get to know you, your case and what’s important to you. Nothing in law moves as fast as it does on courtroom drama TV shows. You may want your legal business wrapped up quickly and behind you, but that’s not reality. Courts don’t work that way, government clerk offices don’t work that way. There’s no special secret to jumping to the head of the line. I highly recommend Mr Langan, a long standing member of the community, who sees each person as the individual they are without judgement.

anonymous
August 26, 2015

Mr. Langan is an honest, ethical attorney and truly listens to the needs of his clients. He is very willing to present different options and fully discuss the possible outcomes. His advice and legal work have been invaluable to me. His staff is very responsive, organized, and available. I would highly recommend Attorney Langan!

Amy
March 28, 2018

I hired Alf Langan for a family court case back in 2012. I wrote an honest poor review of my experience. Now he's disputing my review as if he never represented me. Here is my honest review below, as the original was removed due to his dishonest dispute. If you have this many Poor reviews and have also been disciplined as a lawyer, maybe you should take a look at your performance rather than get honest review removed. I hired this attorney for a very simple family court matter. I made a huge mistake. He does not respond very well to emails, if at all. He sent about 10 emails about a certain topic for NO reason as they were not getting us anywhere. Then I am charged for them. He charged me for part of my initial conversation with him, never telling me this until I see the bill. I waited 2 weeks for a call back and made 3 calls total before getting one back. He sent me a time sensitive email and implied that I needed to answer him and he would pass the answer to the parties involved and then he never did tell them. I left him a voicemail the same day regarding difficulties with the party because of his inaction and requested a call back asap because of this and it is now 2 full business days later and still no word. Today I hired a new attorney who has a much better rating than this man. In my opinion, do NOT waste your money. I have gone through almost $1,500 and all he did was go to one court date and send countless useless emails. Then I had to call him to let him know that these emails were useless and he wasn't listening to me. Although he seems like a nice man, as an attorney; get someone else.

Kevin oliver
August 26, 2016

Very very unprofessional.He has a great paralegal daniel.But he just want money a more money and cant tell u whats going on with ur case.received and email from his paralegal the the DA was dropping the owi charge,get to court ask mr langan and he knows nothing,how are u going to represent me and you not communicating with ur paralegal.PLEASE DO NOT WASTE MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joan
August 14, 2015

Very disappointed with this attorney whose handling of our case caused us a tremendous amount of grief and anxiety. As a recent graduate of law school, I was looking forward to working with him and learning from him but this attorney demonstrated how clients should never be treated. After our initial two meetings and he had been paid, Attorney Langan did not initiate any contact with us whatsoever other than to send additional billings and forward docket filings; filings that we had already obtained ourselves. Our case in the Tax Court had been ongoing for sixteen months by the time Langan was hired and entered an appearance in our case. I sent him copies of the paperwork pertinent to the case, including the results of our discovery requests via USPS Certified Mail. He did not acknowledge that he even received them. Not once did he ask us questions about the facts of the case or what had taken place to date. Consequently, he made a number of errors in the facts he presented to the Court in his pleadings. He appeared for us at the Calendar Call in Tax Court and refused to provide us with a copy of the transcript of the hearing saying even though it existed in the docket, “I don’t know why you would want a copy, I already told you about the hearing.” The judge ordered him to file a brief in the case. What he filed was in the form of a motion and didn’t contain any of the necessary elements of a brief. We sent him an e-mail asking why it wasn’t submitted in the proper form. Langan’s response was: “Do you really want me to answer this, or did you just need to rant. I know you graduated from law school, but you are NOT a lawyer.” He also filed a Motion to Supplement the Record; a motion that was stricken from the record in the case. When we asked him for a clarification concerning the judge’s order, his response was, “If I understand this correctly, the Court rules that since you did not sign the Motion to Supplement the Record that it denied the Motion. We can re-submit the Motion if you wish, I would simply add a signature line for you and Gary, then scan in the signed document and re-file it.” I have no idea why he would say this since he obviously is the attorney representing us and we would not be required to sign his motions in order to have them filed. This same motion indicated that an exhibit was attached, but he failed to attach it. This exhibit consisted of a Forensic Document Examiner’s Report that we had paid $1,500.00 for. Also, Langan had signed an agreement promising to pay the examiner for any additional costs out of the funds in our client escrow account. When Langan received additional billings from the examiner, he would forward them onto us expecting us to pay them even though the invoices were made out to him and he was responsible for their payment. After reviewing our case, Langan told us that we had been treated “egregiously” by the settlement officer in the Collection Due Process Hearing. However, in the Reply Brief that he submitted to the Court, he made an unwarranted derogatory comment about our conduct when dealing with the IRS settlement officer. When we asked him what he was referring to, he actually denied making the statement, even though it clearly appears on Page 7 of the brief. His exact words written in an e-mail to us were: “I did not label you as belligerent; in fact, that word does not appear in my Brief.” Finally, we asked him to withdraw from the case and he agreed. However, the Court denied his motion because it was not done in the proper form and did not comply with Tax Court Rule 24(c).We provided him with a copy of a proper withdrawal motion and it was granted by the Court. We did not feel Attorney Langan demonstrated a high level of skill or professionalism; nor did he exemplify the legal profession’s ideals of honest and ethical dealings in order to protect our legitimate interests in our case.

anonymous
November 5, 2012

I hired this attorney for a very simple family court matter. I made a huge mistake. He does not respond very well to emails, if at all. He sent about 10 emails about a certain topic for NO reason as they were not getting us anywhere. Then I am charged for them. He charged me for part of my initial conversation with him, never telling me this until I see the bill. I waited 2 weeks for a call back and made 3 calls total before getting one back. He sent me a time sensitive email and implied that I needed to answer him and he would pass the answer to the parties involved and then he never did tell them. I left him a voicemail the same day regarding difficulties with the party because of his inaction and requested a call back asap because of this and it is now 2 full business days later and still no word. Today I hired a new attorney who has a much better rating than this man. In my opinion, do NOT waste your money. I have gone through almost $1,500 and all he did was go to one court date and send countless useless emails. Then I had to call him to let him know that these emails were useless and he wasn't listening to me. Although he seems like a nice man, as an attorney; get someone else.