Randy Siper
Montgomery, NY
Licensed for 22 years
Law Degree
Awards
Primary Practice Area
Child custody
Language
English
About
Practices Areas
Child custody
Language
English
Contact
| No address is available.Montgomery, NY| No address is available.Montgomery, NY
Office: N/A
Website: N/AReviews
As a former member of court staff, I processed paperwork regarding certain types of matters in which Mr. Siper was representing a party. Mr. Siper's submissions were timely, professionally and accurately prepared. When appearing before the court, Mr. Siper was always punctual and prepared. He knows how to try a case and advocate for his client. He is an excellent counselor and resource for problems that we all face from time to time.
Mr. Siper billed services for which he did not provide and blatantly lied about aspects of our custody case. His actions caused us to lose the case and the appeal because of his blatant lack of due diligence.
As a former member of court staff, I processed paperwork regarding certain types of matters in which Mr. Siper was representing a party. Mr. Siper's submissions were timely, professionally and accurately prepared. When appearing before the court, Mr. Siper was always punctual and prepared. He knows how to try a case and advocate for his client. He is an excellent counselor and resource for problems that we all face from time to time.
Mr. Siper billed services for which he did not provide and blatantly lied about aspects of our custody case. His actions caused us to lose the case and the appeal because of his blatant lack of due diligence.
As a former member of court staff, I processed paperwork regarding certain types of matters in which Mr. Siper was representing a party. Mr. Siper's submissions were timely, professionally and accurately prepared. When appearing before the court, Mr. Siper was always punctual and prepared. He knows how to try a case and advocate for his client. He is an excellent counselor and resource for problems that we all face from time to time.
Mr. Siper billed services for which he did not provide and blatantly lied about aspects of our custody case. His actions caused us to lose the case and the appeal because of his blatant lack of due diligence.