This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.

This lawyer was non-supportive and showed very poor demeanor toward the opposing lawyer. He failed to seek the truth at the same time not believing that I was innocent of an wrong doing which was proven later. His tactic is to belittle the opposition to drag the case out for his maximum benefit in income by draining my finances. Then, he threaten me by stating: "based on the opposition's attitude, this case is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars." Based on his very poor performance, I fired him after about a month; however, he still kept all the upfront monies I paid him and he did not provide any receipt of the any charges he encountered thus far at that time.