Nancy Cook
Richmond, VA
Licensed for 26 years
Law Degree
Awards
Primary Practice Area
Child custody
Language
English
About
Practices Areas
Child custody
Divorce and separation
Family
Language
English
Contact
Family Law Associates of Richmond, P.C.3711 C Westerre Pkwy Ste CRichmond, VA, 23233-1321
Office: N/A
Website: N/AReviews
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.
Nancy is a kind person, and I believe she has good intentions. However, she does not advocate for her clients. She agreed to take my case, knowing that I needed someone who would advocate for me, and she never did. She dismissed the seriousness of the situation I was in, and minimized my concerns. On an ethical level, knowing the situation I was in I do not believe she should have ever taken my case and instead referred me to an attorney who was more aggressive. She was very passive and dismissive of my concerns, and gave no advice as to how to how to combat the situation.