team-member

Michelle Vlach-Ing

Salem, OR

Licensed for 20 years

Law Degree

Awards

Primary Practice Area

Business

Language

English

About

Michelle has over 20 years experience in the legal profession and over fifteen years experience as an attorney in the private practice of law in Oregon.  Her legal career began in 1995 as a volunteer in the Circuit Court in the State of Hawaii.  As an undergraduate, Michelle interned for a firm specializing in insurance defense in Honolulu, Hawaii.  During law school, she honed her legal skills as a law clerk for a private attorney and later for the Oregon Department of Justice.  As a lawyer, Michelle has made many appearances in State and in Federal Court in Oregon, court annexed arbitration and arbitration before the International Center for Dispute Resolution.  Michelle serves as an arbitrator in Lane, Marion and Multnomah Counties.  She is also a mediator in Marion and Polk County.  She is also is available for private arbitrations and mediations.

Practices Areas

Business

Litigation

Child custody

Domestic Violence

Language

English

Contact

317 Court Street NESuite 203Salem, OR, 97308317 Court Street NESuite 203Suite 203Salem, OR, 97308

Office: N/A

Website: N/A

Reviews

anonymous
February 28, 2012

One of the two best intellectual property attorneys I've been associated with in my 50 years of business experience. Michelle pleaded our case concerning a trademark that was deemed by the trademark officer to be too similar in definition as to be an infringement. She convinced the reviewing officer that we would not be infringing and consequently we received our registered mark for the product. In another instance she negotiated a co-existance agreement that could have cost us the trademark of our flagship product and, even convinced the other party to pay most of our legal expense.

anonymous
February 28, 2012

One of the two best intellectual property attorneys I've been associated with in my 50 years of business experience. Michelle pleaded our case concerning a trademark that was deemed by the trademark officer to be too similar in definition as to be an infringement. She convinced the reviewing officer that we would not be infringing and consequently we received our registered mark for the product. In another instance she negotiated a co-existance agreement that could have cost us the trademark of our flagship product and, even convinced the other party to pay most of our legal expense.

anonymous
February 28, 2012

One of the two best intellectual property attorneys I've been associated with in my 50 years of business experience. Michelle pleaded our case concerning a trademark that was deemed by the trademark officer to be too similar in definition as to be an infringement. She convinced the reviewing officer that we would not be infringing and consequently we received our registered mark for the product. In another instance she negotiated a co-existance agreement that could have cost us the trademark of our flagship product and, even convinced the other party to pay most of our legal expense.