We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!

We took on a Major Insurance Company and it suffices to say that we celebrated a huge victory at the end!! Mark guided me through the complex legal process offering me honest options and consequent chances of success or failure, leaving the final control with me.I always felt that they had my best interest in mind. If you have to go through a legal process, you might as well do it with somebody like Mark Davis.

Recommendation for Mark Davis to anybody needing an attorney for a FINRA case The following details the relationship I had with Mark Davis over a period of approximately a year and a half while engaged in an arbitration dispute with a nationally known investment brokerage firm. It began with a phone call from Mark in response to a letter I sent to several law firms in the area known to handle this type of case. It ended with a successful outcome one week after the completion of the mitigation process. I would strongly recommend him and his law firm to any individuals who feel that they have been wronged during a fiduciary relationship with their brokerage firm: I feel Mark is very competent in this area of the law and has ample experience handling this type of case. Moreover, Mark's firm has the resources and personnel with many additional years of FINRA case experience both as arbitrators and attorneys for the claimant. Mark had access to these resources and utilized them freely during the course of our case. I also believe Mark possesses a keen intellect and as such is able to assimilate and utilize a large amount of information provided in manner which best describes and benefits the case. Mark always appeared to me to be aware that the person who best understood all the details and facts of the case was the claimant. Mark encouraged feedback not just a few time but continually throughout the entire year and a half period required by our case. Mark was open to all of my ideas or suggestions and encouraged me to provide additional information or make corrections. This I appreciated very much as I have no legal training. When Mark felt there was a better approach or one different from mine, he explained it so a person who is not lawyer can understand his position and not feel rebuffed. He never rushed or brushed aside these explanations. As such I had the feeling we were working together as a team as opposed to simply hiring an attorney. It is very easy to talk to Mark. He is relaxed and does not attempt to impress you with legal jargon or his legal wisdom. He tried to explain legal issues in way that a layman can understand and that I appreciated very much. Mark provided copies of all documents which were to be used in very timely fashion. He also provided a time line for the overall case and updated it when required. One might say that this is to be expected, but Mark was, I believe, exceedingly conscientious about providing this information along with very understandable explanations as to what they meant and how they were to be used. The information Mark provided was always totally accurate. Mark was very open about of the costs to pursue our arbitration claim which again one might say should be expected. However, I feel Mark went out of his way to be diligent about conveying all possible costs and potential risks. These risks and costs were provided in language I could understand and allowed me to arrive on decisions which I felt made sense. I cannot recall any situation where the information provided was either incomplete or erroneous. Mark responded immediately to my e-mails or phone calls unless he was in court or preparing for court. Overall, court preparation and court appearances were insignificant in terms of Mark's accessibility during course of the case. Mark was rigorously honest and forthright about the strong points and weak points of our case as it developed. As it turned out, what Mark's initial and on going evaluations of case were, proved to be correct in the finale outcome. Finally, all though there is no way to document this, I firmly believe that had we not had an open, give and take relationship during the entire process including the day when mediation took place, the results may not have resulted in a successful or as successful an outcome.

Mark Davis handled a personal injury case for me and I was very satisfied with Mr. Davis' handling of my case and also with the results. He had a very thorough understanding of the facts in my case, my concerns, and the law. I would highly recommend him!