Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.

Mr. Mirch is very hard working, never takes breaks and he really wants to understand my case. He makes sure he dives big time into all the facts. He is a good person.

Mr. Mirch was my attorney for several years, working through a peer review case. After many visits to his office to go over facts of the case, supplying him with all documents, he came to court very unprepared. He had filed in state court, which did not allow the defense (precedence) he used so the hearing was over in a matter of minutes; my loss.