quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!

quick resolution of my court case in my favor Your review needs at least 75 characters. fail stupid website

Margaret Christopher was hired after the initial attorney was unable to represent me in my divorce. So I hired Margaret. As the matters went along, she started colluding with my former spouse (speaking with him without my knowledge or consent, he stated,at the time, he had spoke with her). Right before going to the final dissolution hearing, I became frustrated with her betrayal, I terminated her. She filed a motion stating I did not want to pay her, but the fact is she was supposedly my attornsy, yet conversing with my former spouse without my consent. Later, she said that my former spouse should have been her client. She then fired me and started to harass me - she went to where I was staying at the time and threatened the landlord. I did not provide my address to Margaret, she got the info from my ex who had a PI situated directly across the street from my dwelling. However, the day she did her antagonizing, I did recognized Margaret that and wondered why she was even there day at my housing, but I was leaving and did not stop to address.the issue. I remember she was wearing jeans, a jean jacket, with a white ribbed turtleneck, and her hair was pulled back. The next day the landlord requested that I leave without giving me any reason, except that he did not want any trouble. Also, the day I paid Margaret, she slanders me to the banks tellers and associates. Lastly, as I am reading over my divorce decree, I find she failed to inform me of key information contained therein. Margaret is a lawyer who has no ethical boundary. She will collaborate with anyone as long as the money is right. PLEASE DO NOT HIRE THIS PERSON!!!