My case is an unusual case where my case was bounced around the Federal and State courts because Kirk T Kennedy and the Clark County's civil D.A attorney Yolanda Givens were not being transparent with the court. My case was about how I had severe/ anxiety, panic attack, depression, and reported I was suicidal in a workers comp claim because I was being harassed at work after making an internal complaint. I ended up going on FMLA, and after I returned from FMLA, I was I still had medical issues and requested ADA accommodation with the Office of Diversity and told Anthony Tyler would contact me. Clark County's department of Juvenile Justice gave me a memo refusing 1) mentor 2) job 3) meditation 4) group Counseling 5) accommodation for hand- tremors I had a severe panic attack and was taken to work from the hospital. I ended up hiring an attorney at that time named Christian Gabroy help me get accommodation for work. I had another set back and my doctor requested a transfer on May 11th 2009, I was ordered back to work and told I would be fired if I didn't return to work. UMC v Jayne Feshold shows Anthony Tyler the same OOD investigator that was handling my case was handling the Feshold case to determine if Feshold was covered by the ADA, UMC put Feshold on light duty and spent 90 days to see if she was covered by the ADA. Anthony Tyler of the OOD claimed Scupi didn't have an impairment that substantially limited a life activity and UMC did a medical separation. D.J.J.S ordered me back to work when I wasn't medically cleared even though I was having medical issues at work. On May 21st 2009 Anthony Tyler of the OOD claimed I didn't have an impairment that substantially limited a life activity. Yolanda Givens core argument in the Federal and State Courts was, I couldn't do the essential functions of the job (attendance) under the 2008 ADA amendment act, working is a life activity, I should have been covered by the ADA. Since DJJS refused the reasonable accommodations for a mentor, job coach, and even meditation the issues in the warehouse were not getting resolved. On June 23rd 2009 I asked to speak to the Director because cooks were being told not to talk to me, a co- worker got in my face and I thought he was going to hit me. I went to the hospital for a stress reaction. I was using vacation time for sick leave and I believe that DJJS was waiting for my vacation time to run out so they could fire me for non ADA attendance issues. I ended up having a nervous breakdown and tried to take my life. On July 31st 2009 Therese Scupi gave me a letter saying I do have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity and I can't work with or without accommodation as a Senior Storekeeper and I had 30 days to find another job. I ended up going on disability for a couple of years because I couldn't even do my essential job duties at home . The 9th Circuit Court ruled that Kennedy didn't put the medical separation in his opening brief so they can't rule on ADA retaliation and sent the case back to the State because they claimed I could do my job duties at home. The Arbitrator in the non- binding arbitration ruled the medical separation policy wasn't followed and Clark County should have sent me to their doctors before terminating me. In an immunity Summary Judgment with Judge Israel, Kennedy refused to answer Judge Israel question on what the 9th Circuit Court ruled. Judge Israel granted a Summary Judgment. Kennedy made slanderous comments and quit my case in the middle of an appeal. The Nevada Court of Appeals ruled that I don't deny having severe/ anxiety, panic attack and depression, that I can't do multiple assignments, focus, concentrate, communicate, handle stress which contradict the federal court ruling. If the State ruling was true, why did they make me represent myself when they believed I was partially or fully incapacitated?

My case is an unusual case where my case was bounced around the Federal and State courts because Kirk T Kennedy and the Clark County's civil D.A attorney Yolanda Givens were not being transparent with the court. My case was about how I had severe/ anxiety, panic attack, depression, and reported I was suicidal in a workers comp claim because I was being harassed at work after making an internal complaint. I ended up going on FMLA, and after I returned from FMLA, I was I still had medical issues and requested ADA accommodation with the Office of Diversity and told Anthony Tyler would contact me. Clark County's department of Juvenile Justice gave me a memo refusing 1) mentor 2) job 3) meditation 4) group Counseling 5) accommodation for hand- tremors I had a severe panic attack and was taken to work from the hospital. I ended up hiring an attorney at that time named Christian Gabroy help me get accommodation for work. I had another set back and my doctor requested a transfer on May 11th 2009, I was ordered back to work and told I would be fired if I didn't return to work. UMC v Jayne Feshold shows Anthony Tyler the same OOD investigator that was handling my case was handling the Feshold case to determine if Feshold was covered by the ADA, UMC put Feshold on light duty and spent 90 days to see if she was covered by the ADA. Anthony Tyler of the OOD claimed Scupi didn't have an impairment that substantially limited a life activity and UMC did a medical separation. D.J.J.S ordered me back to work when I wasn't medically cleared even though I was having medical issues at work. On May 21st 2009 Anthony Tyler of the OOD claimed I didn't have an impairment that substantially limited a life activity. Yolanda Givens core argument in the Federal and State Courts was, I couldn't do the essential functions of the job (attendance) under the 2008 ADA amendment act, working is a life activity, I should have been covered by the ADA. Since DJJS refused the reasonable accommodations for a mentor, job coach, and even meditation the issues in the warehouse were not getting resolved. On June 23rd 2009 I asked to speak to the Director because cooks were being told not to talk to me, a co- worker got in my face and I thought he was going to hit me. I went to the hospital for a stress reaction. I was using vacation time for sick leave and I believe that DJJS was waiting for my vacation time to run out so they could fire me for non ADA attendance issues. I ended up having a nervous breakdown and tried to take my life. On July 31st 2009 Therese Scupi gave me a letter saying I do have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity and I can't work with or without accommodation as a Senior Storekeeper and I had 30 days to find another job. I ended up going on disability for a couple of years because I couldn't even do my essential job duties at home . The 9th Circuit Court ruled that Kennedy didn't put the medical separation in his opening brief so they can't rule on ADA retaliation and sent the case back to the State because they claimed I could do my job duties at home. The Arbitrator in the non- binding arbitration ruled the medical separation policy wasn't followed and Clark County should have sent me to their doctors before terminating me. In an immunity Summary Judgment with Judge Israel, Kennedy refused to answer Judge Israel question on what the 9th Circuit Court ruled. Judge Israel granted a Summary Judgment. Kennedy made slanderous comments and quit my case in the middle of an appeal. The Nevada Court of Appeals ruled that I don't deny having severe/ anxiety, panic attack and depression, that I can't do multiple assignments, focus, concentrate, communicate, handle stress which contradict the federal court ruling. If the State ruling was true, why did they make me represent myself when they believed I was partially or fully incapacitated?

My case is an unusual case where my case was bounced around the Federal and State courts because Kirk T Kennedy and the Clark County's civil D.A attorney Yolanda Givens were not being transparent with the court. My case was about how I had severe/ anxiety, panic attack, depression, and reported I was suicidal in a workers comp claim because I was being harassed at work after making an internal complaint. I ended up going on FMLA, and after I returned from FMLA, I was I still had medical issues and requested ADA accommodation with the Office of Diversity and told Anthony Tyler would contact me. Clark County's department of Juvenile Justice gave me a memo refusing 1) mentor 2) job 3) meditation 4) group Counseling 5) accommodation for hand- tremors I had a severe panic attack and was taken to work from the hospital. I ended up hiring an attorney at that time named Christian Gabroy help me get accommodation for work. I had another set back and my doctor requested a transfer on May 11th 2009, I was ordered back to work and told I would be fired if I didn't return to work. UMC v Jayne Feshold shows Anthony Tyler the same OOD investigator that was handling my case was handling the Feshold case to determine if Feshold was covered by the ADA, UMC put Feshold on light duty and spent 90 days to see if she was covered by the ADA. Anthony Tyler of the OOD claimed Scupi didn't have an impairment that substantially limited a life activity and UMC did a medical separation. D.J.J.S ordered me back to work when I wasn't medically cleared even though I was having medical issues at work. On May 21st 2009 Anthony Tyler of the OOD claimed I didn't have an impairment that substantially limited a life activity. Yolanda Givens core argument in the Federal and State Courts was, I couldn't do the essential functions of the job (attendance) under the 2008 ADA amendment act, working is a life activity, I should have been covered by the ADA. Since DJJS refused the reasonable accommodations for a mentor, job coach, and even meditation the issues in the warehouse were not getting resolved. On June 23rd 2009 I asked to speak to the Director because cooks were being told not to talk to me, a co- worker got in my face and I thought he was going to hit me. I went to the hospital for a stress reaction. I was using vacation time for sick leave and I believe that DJJS was waiting for my vacation time to run out so they could fire me for non ADA attendance issues. I ended up having a nervous breakdown and tried to take my life. On July 31st 2009 Therese Scupi gave me a letter saying I do have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity and I can't work with or without accommodation as a Senior Storekeeper and I had 30 days to find another job. I ended up going on disability for a couple of years because I couldn't even do my essential job duties at home . The 9th Circuit Court ruled that Kennedy didn't put the medical separation in his opening brief so they can't rule on ADA retaliation and sent the case back to the State because they claimed I could do my job duties at home. The Arbitrator in the non- binding arbitration ruled the medical separation policy wasn't followed and Clark County should have sent me to their doctors before terminating me. In an immunity Summary Judgment with Judge Israel, Kennedy refused to answer Judge Israel question on what the 9th Circuit Court ruled. Judge Israel granted a Summary Judgment. Kennedy made slanderous comments and quit my case in the middle of an appeal. The Nevada Court of Appeals ruled that I don't deny having severe/ anxiety, panic attack and depression, that I can't do multiple assignments, focus, concentrate, communicate, handle stress which contradict the federal court ruling. If the State ruling was true, why did they make me represent myself when they believed I was partially or fully incapacitated?