Kevin Blake
N/A
Licensed for 47 years
Law Degree
Awards
Primary Practice Area
Litigation
Language
English
About
Practices Areas
Business
Litigation
Language
English
Contact
Reviews
He allowed the defense to enter in a written phone message, that was fake, in order to taint my character. The message was fabricated, and he said, "there is nothing we can do about it". The article that led to this trial, was not admissable, while a workers compensation injury, was allowed, that was irrelevant. Had he gone through my medical records, he would have noticed, that this "trumped up" message, was non-existent. I paid for my records, and the "message" is not there. There is no follow-up appointment or police report over this "message". If it was real, there would be.
He allowed the defense to enter in a written phone message, that was fake, in order to taint my character. The message was fabricated, and he said, "there is nothing we can do about it". The article that led to this trial, was not admissable, while a workers compensation injury, was allowed, that was irrelevant. Had he gone through my medical records, he would have noticed, that this "trumped up" message, was non-existent. I paid for my records, and the "message" is not there. There is no follow-up appointment or police report over this "message". If it was real, there would be.
He allowed the defense to enter in a written phone message, that was fake, in order to taint my character. The message was fabricated, and he said, "there is nothing we can do about it". The article that led to this trial, was not admissable, while a workers compensation injury, was allowed, that was irrelevant. Had he gone through my medical records, he would have noticed, that this "trumped up" message, was non-existent. I paid for my records, and the "message" is not there. There is no follow-up appointment or police report over this "message". If it was real, there would be.
He allowed the defense to enter in a written phone message, that was fake, in order to taint my character. The message was fabricated, and he said, "there is nothing we can do about it". The article that led to this trial, was not admissable, while a workers compensation injury, was allowed, that was irrelevant. Had he gone through my medical records, he would have noticed, that this "trumped up" message, was non-existent. I paid for my records, and the "message" is not there. There is no follow-up appointment or police report over this "message". If it was real, there would be.