John represented me briefly, he never exhibited an understanding of events, never had any insight observations suggestions or strategy beyond a pedestrian approach to preparing for trial which in his own notes he expressed slim chance of success for a projected $125,000 in expenses. He employs a vague and ambiguous communication style designed to increase engagement and billable hours not towards respect or resolution. He adamantly refused to hear any criticism of his work. In my opinion a very poor lawyer indifferent to a clients input.

John represented me briefly, he never exhibited an understanding of events, never had any insight observations suggestions or strategy beyond a pedestrian approach to preparing for trial which in his own notes he expressed slim chance of success for a projected $125,000 in expenses. He employs a vague and ambiguous communication style designed to increase engagement and billable hours not towards respect or resolution. He adamantly refused to hear any criticism of his work. In my opinion a very poor lawyer indifferent to a clients input.

John represented me briefly, he never exhibited an understanding of events, never had any insight observations suggestions or strategy beyond a pedestrian approach to preparing for trial which in his own notes he expressed slim chance of success for a projected $125,000 in expenses. He employs a vague and ambiguous communication style designed to increase engagement and billable hours not towards respect or resolution. He adamantly refused to hear any criticism of his work. In my opinion a very poor lawyer indifferent to a clients input.