Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!

Jackie was very thorough and attentive to my case. She isn't what you would expect from a typical lawyer that is out to take your money and move on to the next case. She gave 100% and is one of the few honest lawyers out there. She made AK look like a fool numerous times. Don't waste your time or money with the big name office in town.

Jackie was very biased from day one against me, the mother. She had met my 3 boy's on day one and was completely appalled by their behavior, in the hands of their father. 1 week before the divorce trial she had met with with my two younger boys' ages 11 and 12 at their school and also met with them together. My two younger boys are the best of friends. what one says the other will agree. With this said, she has met my boy's twice for approximately 15 minutes total over 1.5 years and made a conclusion regarding my family knowing where they were living (at this time with the dad and grandma 90 yrs old) was not a good environment for the boys. This is noted in the court documents. But my ex husband still had full custody. Jacqueline is NOT compatible for this position. My children told her they wanted 50/50 and she completely misconstrued the whole conversation. She has now resigned herself to all further cases that may come up regarding placement for my children...what does that tell you!!!