Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.

Mr. Dewey represented me in a relatively difficult divorce case in 2008-09. He was consistently competent, thorough, available, and tactful in this role. What I mean by the latter is that my ex-wife was obstructive and unresponsive to his initial efforts to reach a settlement between her and me. He was always patient and polite but firm with her, and she eventually came around to working together on a settlement that she and I could both live with. In short, I was very impressed by his skills.