Due to a ridiculous comedy of errors resulting in miscommunications between myself, my assigned hearing advocate, the NY office and the staff of Houston office, my ssd case was neither properly documented, understood, developed, nor argued. consequently I was awarded partially favorable, but only with an EOD that qualified me for SSI, not SSD as intended. Houston office did the best they could at the last minute, but were hamstrung due to NY office not communicating to them the details of my case in enough time for them to properly prepare. Houston office did not even have time to study my condition, read and comprehend medical evidence, prepare and submit a brief prior to the hearing due to lack of time to prep due to NY office miscommunicating regarding need to prepare and argue my ssd case concurrently with my ssi case. I talked to NY office staff yesterday and NY says the computer says they were arguing ssd and ssi concurrently, but houston office staff insists they were only aware they were arguing ssi, and therefore only prepared for ssi at the hearing.

Due to a ridiculous comedy of errors resulting in miscommunications between myself, my assigned hearing advocate, the NY office and the staff of Houston office, my ssd case was neither properly documented, understood, developed, nor argued. consequently I was awarded partially favorable, but only with an EOD that qualified me for SSI, not SSD as intended. Houston office did the best they could at the last minute, but were hamstrung due to NY office not communicating to them the details of my case in enough time for them to properly prepare. Houston office did not even have time to study my condition, read and comprehend medical evidence, prepare and submit a brief prior to the hearing due to lack of time to prep due to NY office miscommunicating regarding need to prepare and argue my ssd case concurrently with my ssi case. I talked to NY office staff yesterday and NY says the computer says they were arguing ssd and ssi concurrently, but houston office staff insists they were only aware they were arguing ssi, and therefore only prepared for ssi at the hearing.

Due to a ridiculous comedy of errors resulting in miscommunications between myself, my assigned hearing advocate, the NY office and the staff of Houston office, my ssd case was neither properly documented, understood, developed, nor argued. consequently I was awarded partially favorable, but only with an EOD that qualified me for SSI, not SSD as intended. Houston office did the best they could at the last minute, but were hamstrung due to NY office not communicating to them the details of my case in enough time for them to properly prepare. Houston office did not even have time to study my condition, read and comprehend medical evidence, prepare and submit a brief prior to the hearing due to lack of time to prep due to NY office miscommunicating regarding need to prepare and argue my ssd case concurrently with my ssi case. I talked to NY office staff yesterday and NY says the computer says they were arguing ssd and ssi concurrently, but houston office staff insists they were only aware they were arguing ssi, and therefore only prepared for ssi at the hearing.