I believe Mr. Lindquist did not act in the best interest of my Mother. He went to her home and interviewed her. He told me (P.O.A. and Health Care Directive) that my Mother made it clear to him that she objected to having my brother be appointed her Guardian/Conservator. I was also told that nothing would happen at the upcoming Hearing with the exception of objecting to the Petition. He said at that time a trial date woud be set. When I arrived at the Hearing my brother was on the stand, the Referee was irritated at me for not being prepared with an Ojection (again, I was told by Mr. Lindquist that nothing would happen) and I was given a limited amount of time from the Referee to file my written objections. This at my expense of $324.00. The response via email from Mr. Lindquist said that based on information he received after his visit with my Mom he changed his mind and let the Hearing proceed. He made this decision without knowing or asking me for all the facts.

I believe Mr. Lindquist did not act in the best interest of my Mother. He went to her home and interviewed her. He told me (P.O.A. and Health Care Directive) that my Mother made it clear to him that she objected to having my brother be appointed her Guardian/Conservator. I was also told that nothing would happen at the upcoming Hearing with the exception of objecting to the Petition. He said at that time a trial date woud be set. When I arrived at the Hearing my brother was on the stand, the Referee was irritated at me for not being prepared with an Ojection (again, I was told by Mr. Lindquist that nothing would happen) and I was given a limited amount of time from the Referee to file my written objections. This at my expense of $324.00. The response via email from Mr. Lindquist said that based on information he received after his visit with my Mom he changed his mind and let the Hearing proceed. He made this decision without knowing or asking me for all the facts.

I believe Mr. Lindquist did not act in the best interest of my Mother. He went to her home and interviewed her. He told me (P.O.A. and Health Care Directive) that my Mother made it clear to him that she objected to having my brother be appointed her Guardian/Conservator. I was also told that nothing would happen at the upcoming Hearing with the exception of objecting to the Petition. He said at that time a trial date woud be set. When I arrived at the Hearing my brother was on the stand, the Referee was irritated at me for not being prepared with an Ojection (again, I was told by Mr. Lindquist that nothing would happen) and I was given a limited amount of time from the Referee to file my written objections. This at my expense of $324.00. The response via email from Mr. Lindquist said that based on information he received after his visit with my Mom he changed his mind and let the Hearing proceed. He made this decision without knowing or asking me for all the facts.