team-member

Gordon Wilcox

Seattle, WA

Licensed for 51 years

Law Degree

Awards

Primary Practice Area

Divorce and separation

Language

English

About

Gordon W. Wilcox is a seasoned family law and divorce attorney from Seattle, WA. With more than 35 years of legal experience behind him, Gordon is confident in his ability to provide the exceptional legal guidance and advocacy that his clients need, when they need it the most. Over the years, Gordon has honed his legal skills to focus on complex divorce cases and litigation. He said, “I chose family law because I am more interested in helping individuals than corporations. And I found I could help people in family law.” At the start of every case, Gordon analyzes all relevant facts and information related the case, so he can have a clear understanding of the client's needs and expectations. With these specific goals in mind, he creates an individualized strategy to reach them. Gordon's practice areas include high net worth divorces, relocation, child custody, divorce, and more.

Practices Areas

Divorce and separation

Language

English

Contact

McKinley Irvin1501 Fourth AvenueSuite 1750Seattle, WA, 98101

Office: N/A

Website: N/A

Reviews

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.

Jonathan
February 4, 2011

I had a terrible experience. While he knew divorce law, i thought he was condescending to me, slow to understand facts and quick to spend time when I asked him not to. I felt totally taken advantage of.