George John Gigounas
San Francisco, CA
Licensed for 21 years
Law Degree
Awards
Primary Practice Area
Litigation
Language
English
About
Practices Areas
Litigation
Language
English
Contact
DLA Piper US LLP153 Townsend Street Suite 800San Francisco, CA, 94107-1957153 Townsend Street Suite 800San Francisco, CA, 94107-1957
Office: N/A
Website: N/AReviews
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.
Represented in a dispute over legitimacy of a ballot argument. Spent time with me explaining what I could and could not include, argued constitutional precedents in front of judge, very articulate and well prepared.