team-member

George Edwards

Hixson, TN

Licensed for 28 years

Law Degree

Awards

Primary Practice Area

Litigation

Language

English

About

Practices Areas

Litigation

Language

English

Contact

4845 Hixson Pike Ste DHixson, TN, 37343-4466

Office: N/A

Website: N/A

Reviews

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.

anonymous
December 17, 2019

When in a courtroom, Edwards makes other lackluster attorneys look good. He's a poor courtroom litigator. He also has a problem with practicing his due diligence, which is about to catch-up with him. When he is losing, instead of reading and determining what needs to be done, he complains about the opposing party's work. He seems to have a problem with understanding who he is representing & then fails in his due diligence to protect his client. He is a poor attorney & should not have ever been allowed to practice law. He may be a good lawyer for real estate closings, but nothing else. Hire Edwards at your own risk. You've been warned.