Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.

Woodhouse represented a family member "Sue" in a discrimination case where the employer attempted to back pedal a propsal to fire Sue on false allegations by creating a new job for her. The employer was trying to force Sue to accept the job without reading through the description or understanding the role. Sue's lawyer pushed for Sue to sign as well unaware of the job as well. Sue trusted her lawyer and signed, only to find out later that the job entailed the work load of 2 people and included responsibilities similar to that of a janitor. Woodhouse clearly did not look out for what was in the best interest of her client and allowed the employer to strong arm the client into a disadvantaged position, and then she quit as her representative.