David Ravid
Southfield, MI
Licensed for 40 years
Law Degree
Awards
Primary Practice Area
Brain injury
Language
English
About
David Lawrence Ravid pursued his undergraduate studies at the University of Michigan where he majored in psychology and physical science. Soon after his graduation, he attended the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law where he received his J.D. degree. After being awarded a Master of Law Degree from the University of Pennsylvania Law School, his law career officially began. In 1981, Ravid became a member of the State Bar of Michigan and was admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court, Eastern and Western District of Michigan. Attorneys through the state appoint him to serve as an arbitrator, and he is also a Case Evaluator for the Wayne County Circuit Court and for the Macomb County Circuit Court. Since Ravid & Associates, P.C. was established in 1991, Ravid has effectively represented his clients who have suffered a personal injury by helping them obtain multi-million dollar settlements.
Practices Areas
Criminal Defense
Car Accident
Personal Injury
Brain injury
Motorcycle accident
Trucking accident
Language
English
Contact
Ravid & Associates, P.C.23855 Northwestern Hwy.Southfield, MI, 4807523855 Northwestern Hwy.Southfield, MI, 48075
Office: N/A
Website: N/AReviews
David represented me in a legal matter and I was very impressed with his knowledge and professionalism. I would absolutely recommend him to friends and family.
This man was rude, very uncaring, never explained anything to me, and when I told him that I didn't appreciate his tone, or attitude, he told me to "stop acting like a baby..". All I wanted was information, and not ONCE, did he ever call me about my case, or answer my questions. He talked over me constantly, and all he was concerned about, was his little 33 1/3 %, of my already, small, case. True, I wasn't one of those "hundred thousand dollar" cases, but I still should have been treated with respect, and courtesy. Once, the original attorney had to come in to referee, because Mr. Ravid was so "annoyed" by me, that he felt that someone else needed to be present, because I didn't seem to "understand" how things "worked". No, I understood perfectly, but that doesn't mean that I don't have a right to be updated periodically, and to spoken to with respect. This man should NOT be in the business of practicing law, especially, when he doesn't know how to talk to people.
David represented me in a legal matter and I was very impressed with his knowledge and professionalism. I would absolutely recommend him to friends and family.
This man was rude, very uncaring, never explained anything to me, and when I told him that I didn't appreciate his tone, or attitude, he told me to "stop acting like a baby..". All I wanted was information, and not ONCE, did he ever call me about my case, or answer my questions. He talked over me constantly, and all he was concerned about, was his little 33 1/3 %, of my already, small, case. True, I wasn't one of those "hundred thousand dollar" cases, but I still should have been treated with respect, and courtesy. Once, the original attorney had to come in to referee, because Mr. Ravid was so "annoyed" by me, that he felt that someone else needed to be present, because I didn't seem to "understand" how things "worked". No, I understood perfectly, but that doesn't mean that I don't have a right to be updated periodically, and to spoken to with respect. This man should NOT be in the business of practicing law, especially, when he doesn't know how to talk to people.
David represented me in a legal matter and I was very impressed with his knowledge and professionalism. I would absolutely recommend him to friends and family.
This man was rude, very uncaring, never explained anything to me, and when I told him that I didn't appreciate his tone, or attitude, he told me to "stop acting like a baby..". All I wanted was information, and not ONCE, did he ever call me about my case, or answer my questions. He talked over me constantly, and all he was concerned about, was his little 33 1/3 %, of my already, small, case. True, I wasn't one of those "hundred thousand dollar" cases, but I still should have been treated with respect, and courtesy. Once, the original attorney had to come in to referee, because Mr. Ravid was so "annoyed" by me, that he felt that someone else needed to be present, because I didn't seem to "understand" how things "worked". No, I understood perfectly, but that doesn't mean that I don't have a right to be updated periodically, and to spoken to with respect. This man should NOT be in the business of practicing law, especially, when he doesn't know how to talk to people.