David Auxier
Baker City, OR
Licensed for 40 years
Law Degree
Awards
Primary Practice Area
Criminal Defense
Language
English
About
Practices Areas
Criminal Defense
Business
Real Estate
Personal Injury
Family
Language
English
Contact
Coughlin, Leuenberger & Moon P.C.1650 Dewey AvenueBaker City, OR, 978141650 Dewey AvenueBaker City, OR, 97814
Office: N/A
Website: N/AReviews
Mr. Moon gave us conflicting and ultimately inaccurate information (wrong) about what our rights were, what the law was, and even how much it would cost. Despite charging more than we ultimately paid another attorney to plead the case (more successfully than with him), he either did no research or mis-represented what he did find. Burglary was not an option which the prosecution had, yet he did not challenge it. At every turn, he supported what the prosecution offered and challenged nothing, saying we were guilty, even though the subsequent attorney challenged the charges and got them reduced greatly. In a case involving a young child, this is unconscionable. Three months later, we are still waiting a final accounting of the money.
Mr. Moon gave us conflicting and ultimately inaccurate information (wrong) about what our rights were, what the law was, and even how much it would cost. Despite charging more than we ultimately paid another attorney to plead the case (more successfully than with him), he either did no research or mis-represented what he did find. Burglary was not an option which the prosecution had, yet he did not challenge it. At every turn, he supported what the prosecution offered and challenged nothing, saying we were guilty, even though the subsequent attorney challenged the charges and got them reduced greatly. In a case involving a young child, this is unconscionable. Three months later, we are still waiting a final accounting of the money.
Mr. Moon gave us conflicting and ultimately inaccurate information (wrong) about what our rights were, what the law was, and even how much it would cost. Despite charging more than we ultimately paid another attorney to plead the case (more successfully than with him), he either did no research or mis-represented what he did find. Burglary was not an option which the prosecution had, yet he did not challenge it. At every turn, he supported what the prosecution offered and challenged nothing, saying we were guilty, even though the subsequent attorney challenged the charges and got them reduced greatly. In a case involving a young child, this is unconscionable. Three months later, we are still waiting a final accounting of the money.