team-member

David Auxier

Baker City, OR

Licensed for 40 years

Law Degree

Awards

Primary Practice Area

Criminal Defense

Language

English

About

Practices Areas

Criminal Defense

Business

Real Estate

Personal Injury

Family

Language

English

Contact

Coughlin, Leuenberger & Moon P.C.1650 Dewey AvenueBaker City, OR, 978141650 Dewey AvenueBaker City, OR, 97814

Office: N/A

Website: N/A

Reviews

Aleen
March 10, 2011

Mr. Moon gave us conflicting and ultimately inaccurate information (wrong) about what our rights were, what the law was, and even how much it would cost. Despite charging more than we ultimately paid another attorney to plead the case (more successfully than with him), he either did no research or mis-represented what he did find. Burglary was not an option which the prosecution had, yet he did not challenge it. At every turn, he supported what the prosecution offered and challenged nothing, saying we were guilty, even though the subsequent attorney challenged the charges and got them reduced greatly. In a case involving a young child, this is unconscionable. Three months later, we are still waiting a final accounting of the money.

Aleen
March 10, 2011

Mr. Moon gave us conflicting and ultimately inaccurate information (wrong) about what our rights were, what the law was, and even how much it would cost. Despite charging more than we ultimately paid another attorney to plead the case (more successfully than with him), he either did no research or mis-represented what he did find. Burglary was not an option which the prosecution had, yet he did not challenge it. At every turn, he supported what the prosecution offered and challenged nothing, saying we were guilty, even though the subsequent attorney challenged the charges and got them reduced greatly. In a case involving a young child, this is unconscionable. Three months later, we are still waiting a final accounting of the money.

Aleen
March 10, 2011

Mr. Moon gave us conflicting and ultimately inaccurate information (wrong) about what our rights were, what the law was, and even how much it would cost. Despite charging more than we ultimately paid another attorney to plead the case (more successfully than with him), he either did no research or mis-represented what he did find. Burglary was not an option which the prosecution had, yet he did not challenge it. At every turn, he supported what the prosecution offered and challenged nothing, saying we were guilty, even though the subsequent attorney challenged the charges and got them reduced greatly. In a case involving a young child, this is unconscionable. Three months later, we are still waiting a final accounting of the money.