We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.

We retained Mr. Osborn to arbitrate a rather detailed lawsuit. It became clear during arbitration that he had only reviewed a portion of documentation presented to him, focusing on the "big picture" because he seemed short on time (his delays, as he claimed, were the result of a hunting accident, followed by a week-long bout with the flu). His arbitration award was so off the wall that both parties decided to hash out a settlement agreement separate from the arbitration award - even though the arbitration award had no option to appeal. Imagine a case where the recipient of an arbitrator's award decides to settle in lieu of seek a judgment! It's possible, if that arbitrator is Chris Osborn. He might be a good lawyer, but as an arbitrator, I would avoid.