Charles Thronson
Salt Lake City, UT
Licensed for 44 years
Law Degree
Awards
Primary Practice Area
Medical Malpractice
Language
English
About
Charles Thronson is a senior shareholder in the Litigation practice group and head of the Personal Injury Division at Parsons Behle & Latimer. He has over 35 years of experience and practices throughout the Western United States in the areas of personal injury, trucking injuries, medical malpractice (especially birth injury cases), whistleblower (Qui Tam) and products liability cases. Mr. Thronson has handled a number of cases for personal injury and medical malpractice clients that have generated some of the largest verdicts and settlements in the region. In 2015 he achieved the largest personal injury/medical malpractice verdict in the state's history. He has been an Adjunct Professor of Law at the S.J. Quinney School of Law at the University of Utah, an Adjunct Professor at Westminster College, a long-time member of the Utah Association for Justice (president, 2009-2010) and a frequent lecturer. He is listed in the Top 100 Lawyers in Utah, Mountain States Super Lawyers and he has been recognized since 1995 in The Best Lawyers in America (2012, 2016 Plaintiffs' Lawyer of the Year - Medical Malpractice (Salt Lake City)). Creighton University (J.D., magna cum laude, 1977) (ranked 3rd in class of 172)Editorial Staff, Creighton University Law Review University of Washington (B.A., 1972)Major: Business AdministrationAthletics: Freshman and Varsity Crew Adjunct Professor, Advanced Torts Practice, University of Utah, College of Law, 1999 - 2003 Adjunct Professor, Westminster College, 1986 - 1988 Listed in Best Lawyers in America (1995 - present) in Medical Malpractice, Litigation, and Personal Injury Litigation Selected to the 2015 list as a member of the Nation's Top One Percent by the National Association of Distinguished Counsel Named ACQ Law Awards Leading Lawyer of the Year, 2013 - 2016, Personal Injury (Utah) Named Best Lawyers' 2012, 2016 Plaintiffs' Lawyer of the Year for Salt Lake City in Medical Malpractice Law Listed as one of the Top Lawyers Named by Their Peers, 2012 Listed in Mountain States Super Lawyers Listed in Top 100 Lawyers in Utah Listed in Utah's Legal Elite Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ Rating
Practices Areas
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Personal Injury
Trucking accident
Language
English
Contact
Parsons Behle & Latimer201 S Main St Ste 1800Po Box 45898Salt Lake City, UT, 84111-2218
Office: N/A
Website: N/AReviews
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.
Charles represented my family and me in a medical malpractice case against a major State-run hospital. It was a technical case; Charles ultimately resolved the case by settlement after hiring and consulting with many expert witnesses. The only negative is that he left our case on the back-burner for several years. On the plus side, he was very supportive of our family on a human level.