Mr. Bracey worked extremely hard on my case to help me find a resolution and to settle my divorce. He is very knowledgeable and treated my in a very respectful manner. He was very honorable when it came to working out payments. He never overcharged, he only charged for work done. He helped me through the divorce process. He would fight for me and my rights, which I felt was very important. He is a man of integrity and compassion. I was very grateful for his help and treatment shown towards me. I would recommend Mr. Bracey to anyone needing a divorce lawyer.

Please stay away from him. No results and keep demanding money and no results.

Very unprofessional took my money 3000 dollars wanted more and didn't do anything to bring my case to court waste of money and lot of aggravation

I have not received proper legal counsel, service, or representation. Bracey dragged out my case with sole intent to personally gain. My daughter and I were in dire need of service. Yet my case was prolonged and delayed, Charles was very passive and relaxed handling business that should have been handled diligently, timely, and passionately. He did not return calls, texts, or emails. It was thoroughly conveyed through Bracey's practices that the legal procedures and counsel given by Charles was time wasting. The respondent of my case violated a court order numerous of times in which I obtained myself by filing a pro se motion of parentage. It's undisputed that a rule for contempt should have been initiated, executed, and warranted against my respondent. Considering the vast amount of evidence I submitted and the time that I put into my case gathering details, dates, time, and all persons associated with my concern its concluded and prominent that Charles work, time, and attention to my case was discreet. Charles passively advocated my circumstance and I have lost a lot of time and money gaining nothing. According to another law firm, which will remain nameless, "I was losing my case; Charles [was] moving backwards. The first and only petition and motion that should have been filed was a contempt order for my visitation being withheld through a court order I was an awarded with a pro se. Nothing but continuances was permitted allowing the mother to abuse, dictate, and override my father's right, state legislation, and court order.

Mr. Bracey worked extremely hard on my case to help me find a resolution and to settle my divorce. He is very knowledgeable and treated my in a very respectful manner. He was very honorable when it came to working out payments. He never overcharged, he only charged for work done. He helped me through the divorce process. He would fight for me and my rights, which I felt was very important. He is a man of integrity and compassion. I was very grateful for his help and treatment shown towards me. I would recommend Mr. Bracey to anyone needing a divorce lawyer.

Please stay away from him. No results and keep demanding money and no results.

Very unprofessional took my money 3000 dollars wanted more and didn't do anything to bring my case to court waste of money and lot of aggravation

I have not received proper legal counsel, service, or representation. Bracey dragged out my case with sole intent to personally gain. My daughter and I were in dire need of service. Yet my case was prolonged and delayed, Charles was very passive and relaxed handling business that should have been handled diligently, timely, and passionately. He did not return calls, texts, or emails. It was thoroughly conveyed through Bracey's practices that the legal procedures and counsel given by Charles was time wasting. The respondent of my case violated a court order numerous of times in which I obtained myself by filing a pro se motion of parentage. It's undisputed that a rule for contempt should have been initiated, executed, and warranted against my respondent. Considering the vast amount of evidence I submitted and the time that I put into my case gathering details, dates, time, and all persons associated with my concern its concluded and prominent that Charles work, time, and attention to my case was discreet. Charles passively advocated my circumstance and I have lost a lot of time and money gaining nothing. According to another law firm, which will remain nameless, "I was losing my case; Charles [was] moving backwards. The first and only petition and motion that should have been filed was a contempt order for my visitation being withheld through a court order I was an awarded with a pro se. Nothing but continuances was permitted allowing the mother to abuse, dictate, and override my father's right, state legislation, and court order.

Mr. Bracey worked extremely hard on my case to help me find a resolution and to settle my divorce. He is very knowledgeable and treated my in a very respectful manner. He was very honorable when it came to working out payments. He never overcharged, he only charged for work done. He helped me through the divorce process. He would fight for me and my rights, which I felt was very important. He is a man of integrity and compassion. I was very grateful for his help and treatment shown towards me. I would recommend Mr. Bracey to anyone needing a divorce lawyer.

Please stay away from him. No results and keep demanding money and no results.

Very unprofessional took my money 3000 dollars wanted more and didn't do anything to bring my case to court waste of money and lot of aggravation

I have not received proper legal counsel, service, or representation. Bracey dragged out my case with sole intent to personally gain. My daughter and I were in dire need of service. Yet my case was prolonged and delayed, Charles was very passive and relaxed handling business that should have been handled diligently, timely, and passionately. He did not return calls, texts, or emails. It was thoroughly conveyed through Bracey's practices that the legal procedures and counsel given by Charles was time wasting. The respondent of my case violated a court order numerous of times in which I obtained myself by filing a pro se motion of parentage. It's undisputed that a rule for contempt should have been initiated, executed, and warranted against my respondent. Considering the vast amount of evidence I submitted and the time that I put into my case gathering details, dates, time, and all persons associated with my concern its concluded and prominent that Charles work, time, and attention to my case was discreet. Charles passively advocated my circumstance and I have lost a lot of time and money gaining nothing. According to another law firm, which will remain nameless, "I was losing my case; Charles [was] moving backwards. The first and only petition and motion that should have been filed was a contempt order for my visitation being withheld through a court order I was an awarded with a pro se. Nothing but continuances was permitted allowing the mother to abuse, dictate, and override my father's right, state legislation, and court order.