team-member

Bruce Fredrickson

Washington, DC

Licensed for 45 years

Law Degree

Awards

Primary Practice Area

Employment & Labor

Language

English

About

Practices Areas

Personal Injury

Employment and labor

Civil Rights

Language

English

Contact

Webster, Fredrickson & Brackshaw1775 K Street N West Suite 600Washington, DC, 20006

Office: N/A

Website: N/A

Reviews

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.

anonymous
June 11, 2011

It has taken 20+ years to learn the deceptions Mr. Fredrickson used to profit from our representation. The settlement agreement is a forgery. Documents were not sought or produced. USC 5 2302 was knowing violated. A temporary respraing order was violated on the first day and Mr. Fredrickson failed to advise us properly as to our recourse in many matters. The evidence collected speaks poorly of Mr. Fredrickson's representation and underscores a relationship developed between this attorney and our opposition. Keep Your Distance.