What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.

What if your lawyer waived you off when you are about to respond to a judge's request as to who will be testifying in the court hearing that day? And you do so because you believed the lawyer when he told you just the prior evening that you may be able to speak? But then when you try to speak again, the judge saying that the lawyer can let you do so, you get reprimanded by the lawyer, let alone him going back on his word? Brent Wamsley, on that evening, said it was even a maybe that I could testify that day even though he would be the one responsible for me not being able to do so. Consider also that Wamsley told me one thing but said something else on the same matter to others -- or me -- on at least three other occasions (there are words to fit that definition, aren't there?). Consider also that there were 21 total reasons in that hearing that disappointed me, I do not in any form or fashion recommend Brent Wamsley to be your legal counsel. I actually recommend against it. You may think I'm this upset because the hearing was relatively recent, but that is not so. The hearing was two-and-a-half weeks ago.